Clashing Theories

The discussion of determining which international relations theory is correct and which are false is a waste of time. Like anything that contradicts another thing, a common ground cannot be found without compromising the essence of each theory. Religion is a perfect example. Two contradicting religions cannot be practiced by one person, because religious principles are stated in truths, and when these do not coincide a person cannot practice both religions without breaking the spiritual understanding of each religion respectively. To be more specific, Christians base their faith on the belief that Jesus, whom they believe is God’s son, came to earth and died so that believers could be granted forgiveness from their sins and, upon death, be accepted into eternal life in heaven. Hinduism is based on the recognition of Brahman, a three-in-one god, and the principle of reincarnation. The ultimate goal is to eventually reach Nirvana, the end of their reincarnation journey. Christians believe that one must believe in Jesus in order to receive everlasting life and since the Hindu religion does not acknowledge Jesus as the Messiah, it is impossible for Hindus to enter heaven. Another even more stark contradiction to both above mentioned religions is atheism. Aligning oneself with a religion that states the belief in a higher, holy power directly contradicts with the belief that no higher power exists.

Similarly, it is impossible to decide which IR theory is correct. All theories are subject to each individuals opinions and perspectives. Although there may be overlapping qualities in the theories, or there may be grey areas in which multiple theories seem applicable or no theories seem applicable, each stands on its own, unable to be meshed with the other theories. Individuals must decide for themselves as to which theory they find more applicable to world politics.